Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
We researched OpenAI’s patents and curated them in an Airtable as a convenient reference. To our surprise, OpenAI only has nine active granted (B1 and B2) public patents and three A1 patents.
When exploring patent documents, you will encounter various publication types that indicate the status and stage of the patent application process; here is a quick summary.
A1: Pending application, published 18 months after the priority date.
B1: Granted patent, not previously published as A1.
B2: Granted patent, previously published as A1.
It’s interesting to note how quickly OpenAI was granted these patents. OpenAI averaged 11 months from the application date to the grant date, which is impressive compared to the industry average of 24 months.
Note: This list will remain updated as an easy-to-reference point for upcoming OpenAI patents from newest to oldest.
Patent Number: US 12051205 B1
Application Date: 2023-09-27
Published Date: 2024-07-30
Inventors: Deutsch; Noah, Zweig; Benjamin
Link to Patent: US12051205B1
Abstract:
Disclosed embodiments may include a method of interacting with a multimodal machine learning model; the method may include providing a graphical user interface associated with a multimodal machine learning model. The method may further include displaying an image to a user in the graphical user interface. The method may also include receiving a textual prompt from the user and then generating input data using the image and the textual prompt. The method may further include generating an output at least in part by applying the input data to the multimodal machine learning model, the multimodal machine learning model configured using prompt engineering to identify a location in the image conditioned on the image and the textual prompt, wherein the output includes a first location indication. The method may also include displaying, in the graphical user interface, an emphasis indicator at the indicated first location in the image.
Patent Number: US 20240249186 A1
Application Date: 2023-01-23
Published Date: 2024-07-25
Inventors: Neelakantan; Arvind, XU; Tao
Link to Patent: US20240249186A1
Abstract:
Embodiments of the present disclosure may include systems, methods, and computer readable media for generating a vector representation, including receiving a training data set, the training data set including a plurality of paired data samples corresponding to positive example pairs, each positive example pair including a first data unit and a second data unit. Embodiments may also include converting the training data set into at least one first vector of a vector representation. Embodiments may further include accessing one or more negative example pairs to contrast against the positive example pairs. Embodiments may also include converting the one or more negative example pairs into one or more second vectors of the vector representation. Embodiments may further include training an artificial machine learning model to generate additional vectors of the vector representation. Further embodiments may include systems, methods, and media for determining semantic similarity based on one or more vector representations.
Patent Number: US 12039431 B1
Application Date: 2023-09-27
Published Date: 2024-07-16
Inventors: Deutsch; Noah, Turley; Nicholas, Zweig; Benjamin
Link to Patent: US12039431B1
Abstract:
The disclosed embodiments may include a method of interacting with a multimodal machine learning model; the method may include providing a graphical user interface associated with a multimodal machine learning model. The method may further include displaying an image to a user in the graphical user interface. The method may also include receiving a textual prompt from the user and then generating input data using the image and the textual prompt. The method may further include generating an output at least in part by applying the input data to the multimodal machine learning model, the multimodal machine learning model configured using prompt engineering to identify a location in the image conditioned on the image and the textual prompt, wherein the output comprises a first location indication. The method may also include displaying, in the graphical user interface, an emphasis indicator at the indicated first location in the image.
Patent Number: US 20240020116 A1
Application Date: 2023-05-23
Published Date: 2024-06-11
Inventors: Chen; Mark, Tworek; Jerry, Sutskever; Illya, Zaremba; Wojciech, Jun; Heewoo, Ponde De Olivera Pinto; Henrique
Link to Patent: US20240020116A1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating natural language based on computer code input. In an embodiment, a method may comprise one or more of: accessing a docstring generation model configured to generate docstrings from computer code; receiving one or more computer code samples; generating, using the docstring generation model and based on the received one or more computer code samples, one or more candidate docstrings representing natural language text, each of the one or more candidate docstrings being associated with at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples; identifying at least one of the one or more candidate docstrings that provides an intent of the at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples; and/or outputting, via a user interface, the at least one identified docstring with the at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples.
Patent Number: US 12008341 B2
Application Date: 2023-05-23
Published Date: 2024-06-11
Inventors: Chen; Mark, Tworek; Jerry, Sutskever; Illya, Zaremba; Wojciech, Jun; Heewoo, Ponde De Olivera Pinto; Henrique
Link to Patent: US12008341B2
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating natural language based on computer code input. In an embodiment, a method may comprise one or more of: accessing a docstring generation model configured to generate docstrings from computer code; receiving one or more computer code samples; generating, using the docstring generation model and based on the received one or more computer code samples, one or more candidate docstrings representing natural language text, each of the one or more candidate docstrings being associated with at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples; identifying at least one of the one or more candidate docstrings that provides an intent of the at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples; and/or outputting, via a user interface, the at least one identified docstring with the at least a portion of the one or more computer code samples.
Patent Number: US 11983488 B1
Application Date: 2023-03-14
Published Date: 2024-05-14
Inventors: Puri; Raul, Yuan; Qiming, Paino; Alexander, Tezak; Nikolas, Ryder; Nicholas
Link to Patent: US11983488B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for automatically generating and editing text. In an embodiment, a method may include receiving an input text prompt and receiving one or more user instructions. The method may also include accessing a language model based on the input text prompt and the one or more user instructions. The method may also include outputting, using the accessed language model, language model output text. The method may also include editing the input text prompt based on the language model and the one or more user instructions by replacing at least a portion of the input text prompt with the language model output text.
Patent Number: US11983806B1
Application Date: 2023-08-30
Published Date: 2024-05-14
Inventors: Ramesh; Aditya, Nichol; Alexander, Dhariwal; Prafulla
Link to Patent: US11983806B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for regenerating a region of an image with a machine learning model based on a text input. Disclosed embodiments involve accessing a digital input image. Disclosed embodiments involve generating a masked image by removing a masked region from the input image. Disclosed embodiments involve accessing a text input corresponding to an image enhancement prompt. Disclosed embodiments include providing at least one of the input image, the masked region, or the text input to a machine learning model configured to generate an enhanced image. Disclosed embodiments involve generating, with the machine learning model, the enhanced image based on at least one of the input image, the masked region, or the text input.
Patent Number: US 11922144 B1
Application Date: 2023-03-20
Published Date: 2024-03-05
Inventors: Mishchenko; Andrey, Medina; David, McMillan; Paul, Eleti; Athyuttam
Link to Patent: US11922144B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for integrating a particular external application programming interface (API) with a natural language model user interface. In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a first input at the natural language model user interface, determining the first input includes a request to integrate the particular external application programming interface (API) with the natural language model user interface, identifying the particular external API based on the received input, integrating the particular external API with the natural language model user interface, accessing the particular external API based on the first input or a second input at the natural language model user interface, and transmitting, based on the accessing, a response message to the natural language model user interface, the response message including a result of the accessing.
Patent Number: US 11922550 B1
Application Date: 2023-03-30
Published Date: 2024-03-05
Inventors: Ramesh; Aditya, Dhariwal; Prafulla, Nichol; Alexander, Chu; Casey, Chen; Mark
Link to Patent: US11922550B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating an image corresponding to a text input. In an embodiment, operations may include accessing a text description and inputting the text description into a text encoder. The operations may include receiving, from the text encoder, a text embedding, and inputting at least one of the text description or the text embedding into a first sub-model configured to generate, based on at least one of the text description or the text embedding, a corresponding image embedding. The operations may include inputting at least one of the text description or the corresponding image embedding, generated by the first sub-model, into a second sub-model configured to generate, based on at least one of the text description or the corresponding image embedding, an output image. The operations may include making the output image, generated by the first second sub-model, accessible to a device.
Patent Number: US 11886826 B1
Application Date: 2023-03-14
Published Date: 2024-01-30
Inventors: Bavarian; Mohammad, Jun; Heewoo
Link to Patent: US11886826B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for automatically generating and inserting text. In an embodiment, a method may include receiving an input text prompt comprising a prefix portion and a suffix portion. The method may also include accessing a language model based on the input text prompt, and determining a set of context parameters based on the input text prompt and the language model. The method may also include generating an output text prompt based on the set of context parameters and the language model, and inserting the output text prompt into the input text prompt.
Patent Number: US 11887367 B1
Application Date: 2023-04-19
Published Date: 2024-01-30
Inventors: Baker; Bowen, Akkaya; Ilge, Zhokhov; Peter, Huizanga; Joost, Tang; Jie, Ecoffet; Adrien, Houghton; Brandon, Gonzalez; Raul Sampedro, Clune; Jeffrey
Link to Patent: US11887367B1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for training a machine learning model to label unlabeled data and/or perform automated actions. In an embodiment, a method comprises receiving unlabeled digital video data, generating pseudo-labels for the unlabeled digital video data, the generating comprising receiving labeled digital video data, training an inverse dynamics model (IDM) using the labeled digital video data, and generating at least one pseudo-label for the unlabeled digital video data, wherein the at least one pseudo-label is based on a prediction, generated by the IDM, of one or more actions that mimic at least one timestep of the unlabeled digital video data. In some embodiments, the method further comprises adding the at least one pseudo-label to the unlabeled digital video data and further training the IDM or a machine learning model using the pseudo-labeled digital video data.
Patent Number: US 20240020096 A1
Application Date: 2023-05-23
Published Date: Pending
Inventors: Chen; Mark, Tworek; Jerry, Sutskever; Illya, Zaremba; Wojciech, Jun; Heewoo, Ponde De Olivera Pinto; Henrique
Link to Patent: US 20240020096 A1
Abstract:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating computer code based on natural language input. In an embodiment, a method may comprise one or more of: receiving a docstring representing natural language text specifying a digital programming result; generating, using a trained machine learning model, and based on the docstring, a computer code sample configured to produce respective candidate results; causing the computer code sample to be executed; identifying, based on the executing, a computer code sample configured to produce a particular candidate result associated with the digital programming result; performing at least one of outputting, via a user interface, the identified computer code sample, compiling the identified computer code sample, transmitting the identified computer code sample to a recipient device, storing the identified computer code sample, and/or re-executing the identified computer code sample.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing