Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Imagine you’re a researcher who has to write an in-depth essay on the effects of inflation on small businesses in new and growing markets.
To back up your statements, you need evidence; facts, figures, and statistics. You fire up your browser and set about researching.
You find the perfect summary in an article that matches your argument. You go to read more and suddenly, you’re hit with a paywall.
The journal kindly informs you that you need to pay to continue accessing the document. OA, or Open Access Publishing, aims to change all of that.
York University Libraries describe Open Access publishing as the practice of making scholarly research available for free, publicly, online.
Traditional publishing models often involve paywalls or subscription fees which can make research inaccessible without payment. OA essentially transforms this process.
Most OA works are published under the Creative Commons licensing structure with different designations, like CC BY, which means you can share, adapt, and build upon a work as long as you give credit to the original author.
Open Access also typically publishes online by default, given the global reach of the internet.
To better understand how Open Access Publishing works, it’s worth taking a closer look at the different models available.
They include:
With Gold Open Access, as noted by Springer Nature, the content is freely available on the publisher’s website. Access is funded through Article Processing Charges (APC) that may be covered by the author, their institution, or other funding.
Although access to research is free, there are still costs associated with publishing, including the editorial process, peer review, administrative costs, digital hosting, and so on. This is where APCs come into play.
Leading journals (think Nature or Springer Nature) with a strong reputation may charge higher fees.
Springer Nature provides information on fees for different journals for 2024 and 2025 publications. Costs for APCs typically range from $1,000-$5,000 per article. Although, some journals may charge higher or lower fees.
Green Open Access is when the author of the work pre-prints or post-prints it in either an institutional archive or a website specific to that subject — however these are typically ‘less discoverable’ locations according to Springer Nature. The publisher may also have an embargo period set up.
Georgia State University describes diamond/platinum open access as the kind of open access that’s typically paid for by an educational institution or even philanthropy. This type of open access publishing doesn’t charge APCs or fees to the author.
Like many other types of publishing and content, AI has absolutely left its mark on Open Access publishing.
For example, AI-powered search makes it easier to find OA articles which increases readership.
Then, some AI tools can help with the peer review and editorial process by checking grammar and spelling, as well as detecting plagiarism.
Another possible innovation for AI in open access publishing could be helping to automate the process of organizing OA articles in a repository by categorizing or creating quick summaries.
OA publishing, by its very nature, generally lets people use and build upon its content and discoveries, so copyright works a bit differently in these cases. Copyright approaches differ across OA publishers or journals, but usually fall into these categories:
In this case, as noted by McGill University, the author retains the rights and grants to distribute the work, a common type of copyright in OA publishing.
However, to enable distribution, this typically includes licensing for the publisher to be the first publisher of the work.
Essentially, the author still maintains control over their research.
Many OA articles use various levels of Creative Commons licenses to express what can and cannot be done with the work.
Beyond these types of copyrights, different publishers might include their own restrictions in terms of whether or not a publication can be used commercially or if it has to credit the author.
The case where the copyright is held by the journal or publisher is more frequently associated with traditional journals — it is less frequent with open access.
Yes, Open Access articles need to be cited just like any other type of article.
You always want to give credit and acknowledgement to the original author when referencing their work to avoid plagiarism.
Here’s how to cite open access articles according to different formats, like APA, MLA, and in a blog post.
Keep in mind that citation style guides may change so it’s best practice to check the style guide for the most up-to-date formatting.
Author(s). (Year). Title. Journal Name, Volume(issue), Page numbers. Example URL
Example:
Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2023). Example of How to Cite Open Access in APA. Example Journal, 15(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/example
Author(s). “Title of the Article.”Journal Name, vol. XX, no. X, Year, pp. XXX-XXX. Example URL. Access Date.
Example:
Smith, John, and Alice Doe. "Exploring the Future of Open Access Publishing." Example Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023, pp. 123–135. https://doi.org/example. Accessed 29 Nov. 2024.
Example:
According to Smith and Doe’s 2023 study published in the Example Journal, Open Access publishing is rapidly evolving (read the full article here).
Then on the text “read the full article here” or directly on the name of “Example Journal,” include a link that points readers back to the original source.
Learn more about how to cite AI as a source.
Open Access Publishing is not without its issues. Here are a few of the most common challenges that open access publishing faces:
York University cautions that one of the most concerning issues with open access publishing is predatory publishing.
While many open access publishers are highly reputable, it is nonetheless important to be aware of journals that exploit the APC model to get paid while offering little to no peer review or editorial oversight.
If you’re interested in publishing in an OA journal, check for the DOAJ Seal of Approval to find reputable organizations worth publishing in.
There are also challenges, particularly for authors, in understanding how the different Creative Commons licenses work.
Understandably, some researchers may be hesitant to release copyrights to the journal or Creative Commons licensing. So it’s important to be fully informed about the process and how it works.
Beyond these challenges, technical difficulties, like detailed digital infrastructure to host, categorize, organize, and archive content is still a cost that needs to be paid. Maintaining these archives over the long term also presents its own set of challenges.
The bottom line is that when it comes to Open Access Publishing, we can all benefit from greater inclusivity and transparency.
Opening access to research, discoveries, findings, and data, helps not only to make research more equitable but also paves the way for groups and individuals to be more connected to insights and shared knowledge.
Learn more about copyrights, publishing, and writing contracts in our top guides:
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
