With the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI), it seems like businesses and individuals are pumping out content like never before. Many content creators have been quick to work this time-saving technology into their processes. However, many haven’t considered who owns AI-generated content — and the issue may be more complex than it seems.
According to the U.S. Copyright Office, with the current laws surrounding copyright in the US, you are the author and owner of an original work as soon as you create and fix it. However, if all you’re doing is giving a generative AI program like ChatGPT instructions to create a blog post, does that really count as an original work?
In this article, we’ll explore who owns AI-generated content in the US, laws regarding intellectual property rights, and where AI fits in. Then we’ll give some tips for content creators and web publishers to safeguard their ownership rights.
When it comes to determining the extent of AI content ownership, we first need to look at intellectual property (IP) law. Your intellectual property rights cover the kinds of intangible things you can create or develop using your mind (for example: ideas, inventions, and artistic expressions).
They typically fall into three categories: trademarks, patents, and copyrights.
While trademarks and patents may apply to other applications and inventions of AI technology, copyright is the branch of IP law most relevant to the ownership of AI-generated content. But it’s not as straightforward as you might think.
So, can you copyright AI-generated content? Or does it belong to the software itself? While the laws and rules may change as this technology continues to evolve, let’s take a look at a couple of the biggest questions currently surrounding the ownership of AI content.
According to current copyright law in the US, no, you can’t copyright AI-generated content.
The US legal system only considers something to be an “original work” if a human comes up with it on their own using some level of creativity. The keyword there is “human”. So, if AI generates a blog post or image by itself, then that output would not be protected by copyright law.
From a copyright perspective, content that has been fully generated by AI either falls under the category of:
One of the most famous examples supporting the condition of human authorship for copyright is Naruto v. Slater. In what has been dubbed the “Monkey Selfie” case, the court concluded that if a monkey takes a picture of itself, then that image isn’t eligible for copyright protection. It needs that human touch to receive this kind of legal ownership.
But just how much of that human element is necessary is up for debate. In 2022, the US Copyright Office both granted and revoked copyright protection for an AI-assisted graphic novel called “Zarya of the Dawn.”
After giving it copyright protection, they sent a letter to author Kris Kashtanova’s attorney. The letter stated that they can only copyright the sections written and arranged by a human. This meant that the images Kashtanova created using the AI image generator Midjourney would not fall under these protections.
So, when there’s a combination of AI and human-generated elements, the human elements may receive copyright protection if they meet the requirements.
As AI technology continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see if US copyright laws change with it. For now, though, you can refer to the United States Copyright Office’s guidelines, “Copyright Registration Guidance: Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence,” for more information.
No. Generally speaking, ChatGPT and similar programs do not own the content you generate with them.
While they don’t all share the exact same policies, many of the most popular generative AI programs give you at least some right to ownership of their output. Take OpenAI, for example.
In their Terms of Use for ChatGPT, DALL·E, and their other services, OpenAI states that:
“As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you (a) retain your ownership rights in Input and (b) own the Output. We hereby assign to you all our right, title, and interest, if any, in and to Output.”
So, you retain the ownership rights to both your inputs and outputs when using OpenAI’s programs and services. You just can’t copyright them and give them legal protection. But does this mean that people can just steal your AI-generated content?
While you may own your outputs in the eyes of the AI companies, you can’t claim any kind of copyright protection without adding that human touch. So, if you’re worried about someone stealing your content, here’s some advice:
It may seem like it has been around for a while at this point, but AI-generated content is still very much in its infancy, especially from a legal perspective. While things are in motion, we ultimately need to wait for more cases and court rulings to gain some clarity around AI content ownership. And with the technology possibly evolving right along with it, it will be interesting to see how things go.
In the meantime, remember the value of adding the human touch to AI-generated content. If you want your content to be eligible for any kind of copyright protection, it can make all the difference.