Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
We’ve moved well beyond just “information overload”. Today, content consumers in the digital age have to be aware of disinformation and misinformation overload. Fortunately, just as technology has advanced to the point of making such campaigns easier and more convincing than ever, so too has it brought about helpful fact checking tools that can act as a website content check or text checker for articles, news stories and other claims.
But which one is the best fact checker and how do they work? In this detailed article, we’ve done a roundup of some of our favorites. We’ll also go into more detail on how they work and when to use which one. Let’s jump right in!
These online platforms leverage trained professionals to manually evaluate stories and claims.
Snopes - Launched in 1994, Snopes is one of the oldest and most trusted fact checking websites. It covers everything from viral news to old urban legends across a wide range of topics.
FactCheck.org - Operated by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, FactCheck.org takes a closer look at the accuracy and truth behind political statements and advertisements in the U.S.
PolitiFact - Through a manual process, PolitiFact fact-checkers use a Truth-o-Meter to determine the truth behind statements made by politicians, which range from True to “Pants on Fire”.
These tools leverage a combination of machine learning, natural language processing and sophisticated algorithms to help pinpoint false information.
ClaimBuster - ClaimBuster scans through large amounts of text, like political speeches, to uncover statements that need fact-checking. Currently, it’s very much in the realm of developers, journalists and other professionals and is a work-in-progress.
Full Fact - Full Fact uses AI to automatically identify false claims in real-time. It’s generally used to flag statements in speeches by prominent public figures.
Originality.AI Fact Checking Tool - Originality.AI’s own comprehensive fact-checking tool leverages extensive use of AI, machine learning and NLP to fact-check statements made in your text either by pasting in the text or uploading a document. As with all of Originality.AI’s tools, it’s one of the most robust and reliable automated fact-checkers currently available.
Browser extensions use a combination of AI and manual ratings to give users real-time feedback while browsing. They’re designed to offer immediate alerts when browsing claims or other questionable content.
NewsGuard - A browser extension that rates news websites based on their transparency and reliability. Each site is given a trustworthiness rating.
Media Bias/Fact Check - Also known as MBFC, this browser fact check app evaluates the factual accuracy of content and assesses bias across over 3,000 news websites.
Rather than platforms that use automated tools or manual teams, some organizations use database fact checking tools to help keep the public informed. They do not themselves assign ratings or reviews, however.
International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) - The IFCN maintains a code of principles that many fact-checking organizations, including Google Fact Check Explorer and Facebook Fact Checkers adhere to in order to ensure credibility.
EU vs. Disinfo - Managed by the European External Action Service, this tool serves as a database for pro-Kremlin disinformation stories.
Both Facebook and Google have recognized the role they play in the publishing and sharing of information and have incorporated fact-checking tools to help educate and inform the public.
Facebook’s Third-Party Fact Checking Program - By collaborating with independent third party fact-checking organizations, Facebook's algorithms help diminish the spread of false news. Read more about how Facebook’s fact checking program works.
Google Fact Check Explorer - Google’s highly successful Fact Checker provides summaries on claims and is a valuable tool for journalists, writers and everyday users looking to corroborate claims via search, images and more.
X/Twitter Fact-Checking Labels - X (formerly Twitter) attaches warning labels on disputed claims or misleading content, redirecting users to more authoritative sources.
Platforms like Wikipedia rely on the collective intelligence of their users to help maintain accuracy. Beyond Wikipedia, Emergent is a real-time rumor tracker that uses user feedback to evaluate viral stories.
As you can see, there are a variety of solutions and ideas for how to tackle the absolute avalanche of misinformation and disinformation out there. In the early days of fact-checking, publications on the internet were minimal and few manual fact-checks could handle the majority of the claims. But as the quantity and speed of information shared began to spread, more aggressive, faster and more thorough tools were needed.
Although machine learning and artificial intelligence have led to considerable advancements in the field of content evaluation in terms of their ability to sift through large amounts of information quickly and analyze patterns, there is still no 100% fool-proof fact checker.
Alongside these developments, the surge in deep fakes (media manipulated to make it look like one person’s likeness is replaced by another) are an entirely new frontier on the misinformation battlefield. New tools are being developed to not only detect these types of online forgeries but also trace where they came from, providing a more detailed, multi-pronged solution to content verification in all of its forms.
It’s important to remember though that no matter how the technology develops, the art and science of fact-checking isn’t just something that should be solely the responsibility of developers or social media or search engines. It should be a collaborative one.
With the rise of misinformation on a global scale, public and private organizations must join with technology companies and everyday users to help address the issue. One such initiative, First Draft’s CrossCheck, has helped to bridge the gap between journalists, newsrooms and tech companies to verify public information during crucial times, such as during election season.
Even with a highly-optimized, community based and technology founded team of fact checkers, there are still limitations to be aware of. As we move toward the future, it’s important to remember that all of the tools profiled here are just that: tools. It’s easy to become over-reliant on fact checkers or search for the best fact checker to help take some of the burden of manual work off your shoulders. However, misinformation campaigns are always evolving and there’s always the possibility of false positives or false negatives as part of the detection process.
Last but not least, it’s important to remember our human biases. Life experience has given them all to us in some form or another, and it’s through our data and our algorithms that AI is trained. Transparency in how these tools operate, as well as regular audits and keeping a “human in the loop” can help to soften the edge of fact-checker limitations.
No matter what, fact-checkers have a vital role to play now and well into the future. But as with any tools, they should be seen in the broader spectrum of creating a more informed society. A public that’s rooted in critical thinking and media literacy, with the right tools at hand can do much more in the fight against misinformation and disinformation than what any code or convincing video could create. It’s up to us to make that change happen.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
